রবিবার, ১৭ মার্চ, ২০১৩

UW-Eau Claire men's hockey team wins NCAA D3 national championship

Posted: Sat 8:09 PM, Mar 16, 2013

').addClass('pl-'+video.id).append( $('').append(''+video.title+'').find('a').click(function() { if($(document).data('first')) { $(document).data('second', true); } var ts = Math.round((new Date()).getTime() / 1000); g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].config.dfp = {adtag:'http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640x480&iu=/301721715/WEAU&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&ad_rule=1&unviewed_position_start=1&correlator='+ts+'&cmsid=1595&vid=ANV_GRTV_'+video.id}; g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].loadVideo(video.id,20, 'GRTV'); $('.playlist_list').removeClass('current'); $('.pl-'+video.id).addClass('current'); $('.rec-'+video.id).addClass('current'); }) ) ); } else { var ts = Math.round((new Date()).getTime() / 1000); g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].config.dfp = {adtag:'http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640x480&iu=/301721715/WEAU&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&ad_rule=1&unviewed_position_start=1&correlator='+ts+'&cmsid=1595&vid=ANV_GRTV_'+initVideo}; g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].loadVideo(video.id,20, 'GRTV'); $('#playlist').addClass('hidePlaylist'); }; }; }); $('.pl-'+id+' a').click(); $(document).data('first', true); var ts = Math.round((new Date()).getTime() / 1000); g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].config.dfp = {adtag:'http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640x480&iu=/301721715/WEAU&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&ad_rule=1&unviewed_position_start=1&correlator='+ts+'&cmsid=1595&vid=ANV_GRTV_'+initVideo}; g_anvato_objects['playlistembed'].loadVideo(initVideo,20, 'GRTV'); $('.playlist_list').removeClass('current'); $('.pl-'+initVideo).addClass('current'); $('.rec-'+initVideo).addClass('current'); } function load_tabbed_playlist(data) { var videos = data.videos; var id = ''; $('#tabbed_playlist').html(''); jQuery.each( videos, function(key, video) { if (key == 0) id = video.id; $('#tabbed_playlist').append( $('').addClass('pl-'+video.id).addClass('row-fluid').attr('style', 'padding-bottom:4px; margin:0px;').append( $('').append( $('').append( '' ).find('a').click(function() { if($(document).data('first')) { $(document).data('second', true); } g_anvato_objects['tabbedplayerembed'].loadVideo(video.id, 20, 'GRTV'); $('.playlist_item').removeClass('current'); $('.pl-'+video.id).addClass('current'); $('.rec-'+video.id).addClass('current'); }).append( $('').attr('src', video.thumbnail).attr('height', '55px') ) ), $('').append( $('').append( $('').text(video.title) ) ) ) ) }); $('#tabbed-vod-player').attr('style', ''); $('#tabbed-vod-player').removeClass(); $('.pl-'+id+' a').click(); $(document).data('first', true); } function change_video(vidid,playerid,mcpid) { g_anvato_objects['playerembed'].loadVideo(vidid,playerid,mcpid); }

The UW-Eau Claire men's hockey team won the NCAA Division 3 National Championship Saturday night in Lake Placid, New York, beating Oswego State 5-3 for the programs's first-ever NCAA D3 hockey title. The Blugolds fell behind 2-0 in the first period, but scored two goals at the end of the period, Jordan Singer and Andrew Wilcox with the goals. In the second period, UWEC got the go-ahead goal from Daniel Olszewski to make it 3-2. In the third period, the Blugolds would take a 4-2 lead on a breakaway goal from Devin Mantha. After the Lakers made it a 4-3 game, the Blugolds got a empty-net goal from Kurt Weston for the game-clinching goal. UW-Eau Claire finishes their championship season 24-5-1.


Source: http://www.weau.com/home/headlines/UW-Eau-Claire-mens-hockey-team-wins-NCAA-D3-national-championship-198633881.html

st. patrick s day brandon lloyd brandon lloyd celtic thunder fabrice muamba collapse prometheus trailer patrice oneal

শনিবার, ১৬ মার্চ, ২০১৩

Missile plan changes may provide opening for talks

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Friday, March 15, 2013, to announce that the Obama administration will add 14 interceptors to a West Coast-based U.S.-based missile defense system reflecting concern about North Korea's focus on developing nuclear weapons and its advances in long-range missile technology. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Friday, March 15, 2013, to announce that the Obama administration will add 14 interceptors to a West Coast-based U.S.-based missile defense system reflecting concern about North Korea's focus on developing nuclear weapons and its advances in long-range missile technology. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, center, walks past Joint Chiefs Vice Chairman Navy Adm. James Winnefeld, left, and Defense Undersecretary for Policy James Miller, at the Pentagon, Friday, March 15, 2013, after announcing the Pentagon will spend $1 billion to add 14 interceptors to a West Coast-based missile defense system, responding to what it called faster-than-anticipated North Korean progress on nuclear weapons and missiles. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Friday, March 15, 2013, to announce that the Obama administration will add 14 interceptors to a West Coast-based U.S.-based missile defense system reflecting concern about North Korea's focus on developing nuclear weapons and its advances in long-range missile technology. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

In this March 7, 2013 photo released by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) and distributed March 8, 2013 by the Korea News Service, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center, uses binoculars to look at the South's territory from an observation post at the military unit on Jangjae islet, located in the southernmost part of the southwestern sector of North Korea's border with South Korea. Seven years of U.N. sanctions against North Korea have done nothing to derail Pyongyang?s drive for a nuclear weapon capable of hitting the United States. They may have even bolstered the Kim family by giving their propaganda maestros ammunition to whip up anti-U.S. sentiment and direct attention away from government failures. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to announce Friday that the Obama administration has decided to add 14 interceptors on the West Coast to the U.S.-based missile defense system. (AP Photo/KCNA via KNS) JAPAN OUT UNTIL 14 DAYS AFTER THE DAY OF TRANSMISSION

(AP) ? In adding 14 interceptors to a missile defense system based in Alaska and California, the U.S. abandoned a key part of a European missile defense plan that had been strongly opposed by Russia. At the same time, the decision provided a potential opening for new arms control talks.

The Obama administration cited development problems and a lack of money on Friday in announcing the cancellation of the interceptors that were to be deployed in Poland and possibly Romania early next decade.

Russian officials suspected that the interceptors were a counter to their missiles and had indicated that they would not consider further nuclear arms cuts unless their concerns were resolved.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the cancellation was part of an overall restructuring of missile defense plans aimed at stopping missiles from North Korea and Iran. He made no reference to Russia's objections to the European plans but said that other parts of the missile defense plans in Europe would move forward and that the U.S. commitment to missile defense in the region "remains ironclad."

The restructuring includes spending $1 billion to add the 14 new interceptors to the 26 that are in underground silos in Alaska to counter the threat from North Korea.

The shift in U.S. missile defense plans in Europe ? it's the second major change to the program since President Barack Obama has been in the White House ? could spark unease among some U.S. allies, including Poland and Romania, who see the system as a sign of U.S. engagement in the region and a counterweight to Russia.

Missile defense has been a contentious issue since President George W. Bush sought to base long-range interceptors in central Europe to stop Iranian missiles from reaching the U.S. Russia believed the program was aimed at countering its own missiles and undermining its nuclear deterrent.

Obama reworked the Bush administration's plan soon after taking office in 2009, canceling an earlier interceptor planned for Poland and radar in the Czech Republic and replacing the high-speed interceptors with slower ones that could stop Iran's medium-range missiles.

Under Obama's plan the interceptors were to be upgraded gradually over four phases, culminating early next decade with those intended to protect both Europe and the United States.

Russia initially welcomed the changes to the Bush plan, and relations between the two powers improved. That, in turn, paved the way for the New START treaty setting new limits on both countries' nuclear arsenals.

But Moscow has since ramped up its criticism of Obama's revisions ? they are backed by NATO ? claiming that the fourth and last planned upgrade of the interceptors would be able to stop its intercontinental missiles launched at the U.S. and undermine Russia's nuclear deterrent.

Whether or not it was intended to, the decision to cancel plans for the long-range interceptors will help the president's arms control goals. A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities, said that Poland and Romania were informed of the decision ahead of the announcement but that Russia was not.

"Canceling Phase 4 opens the door to another round of US-Russian nuclear arms reductions," said Tom Collina, research director at the Arms Control Association. "We give up nothing since Phase 4 was not panning out anyway. This is a win-win for the United States. "

The issue is particularly sensitive because Obama was overheard whispering in an open microphone last year telling then-President Dmitry Medvedev at an international summit that he would have more flexibility on resolving their differences over the missile defense program after his re-election in November. The comment suggested that he might change the plans in Europe.

The decision was criticized by Republicans in Congress who have charged that Obama has undermined allies while pursuing his goals to drastically cut nuclear weapons.

"President Obama's reverse course decision will cost the American taxpayer more money and upset our allies," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., who chairs a congressional panel that oversees U.S. missile defense programs.

Hagel said the U.S. remains committed to all the other parts of the plan, including the first three phases of the plan. He said the decision was prompted by the need to address faster-than-anticipated progress by North Korea on nuclear weapons and missiles. The changes free up the money to do so, he said.

Hagel cited Pyongyang's December rocket launch that put a satellite into space and showed mastery of some of the technologies needed to produce a long-range nuclear missile. He noted that last April, the North Koreans publicly displayed a road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile, the KN-08. Navy Adm. James Winnefeld Jr., vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that missile is believed to be capable of reaching the U.S.

The missile defense system was first fielded by the Bush administration in late 2004. It has a spotty test record and has never been used in actual combat. In addition to the 26 interceptors in Alaska, the system includes four interceptors in California.

Hagel said the 14 additional interceptors should be in place in Alaska by September 2017, but not before they have been adequately tested. The European-based interceptors would not have protected the United States from North Korea.

Hagel also noted that the canceled long-range interceptors in Europe had already faced delays because of congressional budget cuts and that there were technical challenges. A slew of recent reports by congressional and defense analysts suggested the interceptors might not work.

___

Follow Desmond Butler on Twitter at http://twitter.com/desmondbutler

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2013-03-16-US-US-Europe-Missile-Defense/id-c919d1d6cdbc46ccb17afb8b7acbf093

2013 Super Bowl Commercials illuminati illuminati joe flacco Go Daddy Superbowl Commercial 2013 michael oher superbowl score

US to ramp up its anti-missile defenses following North Korean threats

In the wake of recent North Korean missile and nuclear tests, plus increasingly belligerent?rhetoric from Pyongyang, the Pentagon announced Friday that it was adding to US anti-missile defenses.

By Brad Knickerbocker,?Staff writer / March 15, 2013

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel speaks at his news conference at the Pentagon Friday. Hagel announced plans to bolster U.S. missile defenses in response to a growing nuclear threat from North Korea.

Yuri Gripas/REUTERS

Enlarge

In the wake of North Korean missile and nuclear tests and what seems like increasingly belligerent pronouncements from Pyongyang, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced Friday that the US is beefing up its missile defense system.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

That system, 30 anti-missile missiles based in Alaska (26) and California (4), is to be increased to 44 defense missiles in the coming years.

?We will strengthen homeland missile defense by deploying 14 additional ground-based interceptors, GBIs, at Fort Greely, Alaska,? Secretary Hagel said. ?These additional GBIs will provide a nearly 50 percent increase in our missile defense capability.?

In addition to the US-based defense missiles, the US Navy has ballistic missile defense ships cruising off the Korean Peninsula. The US has Patriot missile defense batteries in South Korea, and Japan is developing missile defense systems as well.
?
How likely is it that North Korean missiles could reach US targets?

?We are confident we could defeat a threat from North Korea today,? Air Force General Robert Kehler, chief of the U.S. Strategic Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee this week. But, he added, ?Their activities have our attention, and it has our concern.?

Or as President Obama told ABC News the other day, "They probably can't [hit the United States], but we don't like the margin of error.?

Other US officials have spoken recently of the threat posed by a country whose leader Kim Jong-un is young and newly-installed, and where there is stiff resistance to United Nations sanctions against its recently tested nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

In a letter to the UN Security Council released Friday, North Korea called the most recent sanctions ?a crime? and ?clear proof? that the 15-nation UN body ?was abused into implementing the hostile policy of the United States.? The letter promised ?stronger countermeasures? against the sanctions, and said that should the United States opt for war it is ready to ?fight it out and win a final victory.?

In a statement carried by the official KCNA news agency, a foreign ministry spokesman said North Korea would ?be exercising our right to preemptive nuclear attack against the headquarters of the aggressor in order to protect our supreme interest.?

Just how serious the threat is hard to pinpoint given North Korea?s history of hostile rhetoric and provocative acts ? including its third nuclear test last month, which resulted in the increased UN sanctions.

?We do not know Pyongyang's nuclear doctrine or employment concepts," the director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, told the Senate Intelligence Committee this week. "Although we assess with low confidence that the North would only attempt to use nuclear weapons against US forces or allies to preserve the Kim regime, we do not know what would constitute, from the North's perspective, crossing that threshold."

For this reason, officials are emphasizing that there should be no doubt about US resolve in facing any such threat.

?North Korea?s claims may be hyperbolic ? but as to the policy of the United States, there should be no doubt: We will draw upon the full range of our capabilities to protect against, and respond to, the threat posed to us and to our allies by North Korea,? National Security Adviser Tom Donilon?told the Asia Society in New York this week.

The additional ground-based anti-missile defense announced this week will take about four years to be fully deployed.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/IY0ZJr8SQkY/US-to-ramp-up-its-anti-missile-defenses-following-North-Korean-threats

the fray seahawks new uniforms 2012 tornadoes in dallas anchorman 2 kentucky basketball oaksterdam the fray national anthem

বৃহস্পতিবার, ১৪ মার্চ, ২০১৩

Kim Kardashian, Baby Bump Film Show, Struggle Not to Bust Out of Clothes

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/03/kim-kardashian-baby-bump-film-show-struggle-not-to-bust-out-of-c/

Angie Everhart tom hardy British Open leaderboard Jessica Ghawi People Water Fred Willard Emmy nominations 2012

Electrons behaving like a particle and a wave: Feynman's double-slit experiment brought to life

Mar. 14, 2013 ? The precise methodology of Richard Feynman's famous double-slit thought-experiment -- a cornerstone of quantum mechanics that showed how electrons behave as both a particle and a wave -- has been followed in full for the very first time.

Although the particle-wave duality of electrons has been demonstrated in a number of different ways since Feynman popularised the idea in 1965, none of the experiments have managed to fully replicate the methodology set out in Volume 3 of Feynman's famous Lectures on Physics.

"The technology to do this experiment has been around for about two decades; however, to do a nice data recording of electrons takes some serious effort and has taken us three years," said lead author of the study Professor Herman Batelaan from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

"Previous double-slit experiments have successfully demonstrated the mysterious properties of electrons, but none have done so using Feynman's methodology, specifically the opening and closing of both slits at will and the ability to detect electrons one at a time.

"Akira Tonomura's brilliant experiment used a thin, charged wire to split electrons and bring them back together again, instead of two slits in a wall which was proposed by Feynman. To the best of my knowledge, the experiments by Guilio Pozzi were the first to use nano-fabricated slits in a wall; however, the slits were covered up by stuffing them with material so could not be open and closed automatically."

In their experiments, which have been published 14 March, in the Institute of Physics and German Physical Society's New Journal of Physics, Batelaan and his team, along with colleagues at the Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics, created a modern representation of Feynman's experiment by directing an electron beam, capable of firing individual electrons, at a wall made of a gold-coated silicon membrane.

The wall had two 62-nm-wide slits in it with a centre-to-centre separation of 272 nm. A 4.5 ?m wide and 10 ?m tall moveable mask, controlled by a piezoelectric actuator, was placed behind the wall and slid back and forth to cover the slits.

"We've created an experiment where both slits can be mechanically opened and closed at will and, most importantly, combined this with the capability of detecting one electron at a time.

"It is our task to turn every stone when it comes to the most fundamental experiments that one can do. We have done exactly that with Feynman's famous thought-experiment and have been able to illustrate the key feature of quantum mechanics," continued Batelaan.

Feynman's double-slit experiment

In Feynman's double-slit thought-experiment, a specific material is randomly directed at a wall which has two small slits that can be opened and closed at will -- some of the material gets blocked and some passes through the slits, depending on which ones are open.

Based on the pattern that is detected beyond the wall on a backstop -- which is fitted with a detector -- one can discern whether the material coming through behaves as either a wave or particle.

When particles are fired at the wall with both slits open, they are more likely to hit the backstop in one particular area, whereas waves interfere with each other and hit the backstop at a number of different points with differing strength, creating what is known as an interference pattern.

In 1965, Feynman popularised that electrons -- historically thought to be particles -- would actually produce the pattern of a wave in the double-split experiment.

Unlike sound waves and water waves, Feynman highlighted that when electrons are fired at the wall one at a time, an interference pattern is still produced. He went on to say that this phenomenon "has in it the heart of quantum physics [but] in reality, it contains the only mystery."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Institute of Physics.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Roger Bach, Damian Pope, Sy-Hwang Liou, Herman Batelaan. Controlled double-slit electron diffraction. New Journal of Physics, 2013; 15 (3): 033018 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/~3/XtIks_fN_C0/130313214031.htm

planned parenthood kobayashi margaret sanger paul george eddie long ufc 143 weigh ins micron ceo

বুধবার, ১৩ মার্চ, ২০১৩

124-year rape sentence thrown out for Max Factor heir

Getty Images file

Max Factor cosmetics heir Andrew Luster arrived at Los Angeles International Airport on June 19, 2003, after his capture in Mexico by Duane 'Dog the Bounty Hunter' Chapman.

By M. Alex Johnson, staff writer, NBC News

A California judge Monday vacated the 124-year prison sentence handed down 10 years ago to the great-grandson and heir of cosmetics mogul Max Factor, whose flight and capture helped catapult Duane "Dog the Bounty Hunter" Chapman to international stardom.

But Andrew Luster, 49, won't get a new trial on charges that he drugged and raped three women after Judge Kathryne Ann Stoltz found that only his sentencing, not his conviction, was improper, NBC Los Angeles reported.


Stoltz, a retired Los Angeles Superior Court judge, was hired to hear the case in Ventura County Superior Court after Luster argued that he was improperly sentenced in 2003, when he was convicted on 86 counts of giving three women gamma hydroxybutyrate, or GHB, and raping them while they were unconscious.

Stoltz said the judge at Luster's trial failed to state the reasons for giving Luster consecutive sentences on each count, rather than concurrent sentences. She set Luster's resentencing for April 4.

When Luster jumped his $1 million bond during his trial in 2003, Chapman set out after him, capturing the fugitive later that year in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.

Luster was eventually convicted in a trial in which jurors were shown video that Luster had made of himself engaging in sex acts with some of his victims.

Meanwhile, Chapman and his team were charged with kidnapping Luster ? in Mexico. But they, too, jumped bail and fled back to the U.S., where Chapman got a TV contract; "Dog the Bounty Hunter" made its debut on the A&E network in 2004.

A Mexican court dismissed those charges in 2007 because the statute of limitations had expired.

Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/11/17274124-124-year-rape-sentence-thrown-out-for-max-factor-heir?lite

soa andy williams andy williams Lady Gaga New Girl Avalanna Gigi Chao

মঙ্গলবার, ১২ মার্চ, ২০১৩

Heat-stressed cows spend more time standing

Heat-stressed cows spend more time standing [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 12-Mar-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Madeline McCurry-Schmidt
madelinems@asas.org
217-689-2435
American Society of Animal Science

Bovine behavior changes as the day heats up

Des Moines, IA A new study by researchers at the University of Arizona and Northwest Missouri State University shows that standing and lying behavior can predict heat stress in cows.

In a presentation at the 2013 ADSA Midwest Branch / ASAS Midwestern Section Meeting, Dr. Jamison Allen explained that predicting heat stress is vital for keeping cows healthy and productive. Cows will pant, eat less and produce less milk when their core body temperature increases.

Allen said cows prefer standing to lying on hot days. Cows stand to allow more of their surface area to disperse heat into the air. Allen and his colleagues were curious to see if standing behavior could be used to predict core body temperature.

The researchers used two tools to study the relationship between behavior and temperature. They fitted each cow with an intra-vaginal sensor to measure core body temperature. They also fitted each cow with a special leg sensor to measure the angle of the leg and track whether the cow was standing or lying.

After comparing data from cows in Arizona, California and Minnesota, the researchers concluded that standing behavior and core body temperature are strongly correlated. Allen said cows stood for longer bouts of time as their core body temperatures rose from 101 degrees Fahrenheit to above 102 degrees.

"We can predict the animal's behavior to stand according to their core temperature," Allen said.

According to Allen, dairy producers could use standing behavior to improve well being and efficiency in their herds. He said producers could use coolers and misters to target a specific core body temperature. By encouraging cows to lie down, producers will also help their cows conserve energy.

Allen recommended future studies to see how cows respond to different cooling systems. He said researchers could also study cow behavior related to humidity.

Allen's abstract was titled "Effect of core body temperature or time of day on lying behavior of lactating dairy cows." The research was presented Mar. 12 as part of the Animal Behavior, Housing and Well Being Oral Session.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Heat-stressed cows spend more time standing [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 12-Mar-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Madeline McCurry-Schmidt
madelinems@asas.org
217-689-2435
American Society of Animal Science

Bovine behavior changes as the day heats up

Des Moines, IA A new study by researchers at the University of Arizona and Northwest Missouri State University shows that standing and lying behavior can predict heat stress in cows.

In a presentation at the 2013 ADSA Midwest Branch / ASAS Midwestern Section Meeting, Dr. Jamison Allen explained that predicting heat stress is vital for keeping cows healthy and productive. Cows will pant, eat less and produce less milk when their core body temperature increases.

Allen said cows prefer standing to lying on hot days. Cows stand to allow more of their surface area to disperse heat into the air. Allen and his colleagues were curious to see if standing behavior could be used to predict core body temperature.

The researchers used two tools to study the relationship between behavior and temperature. They fitted each cow with an intra-vaginal sensor to measure core body temperature. They also fitted each cow with a special leg sensor to measure the angle of the leg and track whether the cow was standing or lying.

After comparing data from cows in Arizona, California and Minnesota, the researchers concluded that standing behavior and core body temperature are strongly correlated. Allen said cows stood for longer bouts of time as their core body temperatures rose from 101 degrees Fahrenheit to above 102 degrees.

"We can predict the animal's behavior to stand according to their core temperature," Allen said.

According to Allen, dairy producers could use standing behavior to improve well being and efficiency in their herds. He said producers could use coolers and misters to target a specific core body temperature. By encouraging cows to lie down, producers will also help their cows conserve energy.

Allen recommended future studies to see how cows respond to different cooling systems. He said researchers could also study cow behavior related to humidity.

Allen's abstract was titled "Effect of core body temperature or time of day on lying behavior of lactating dairy cows." The research was presented Mar. 12 as part of the Animal Behavior, Housing and Well Being Oral Session.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/asoa-hcs031213.php

ferris bueller god bless america earned income credit florida primary 2012 super bowl matthew broderick tax refund calculator